The Impact of Incorporating Stylistic Models of Inversion in Teaching Grammar on Students’ Comprehension of Literary Text

Keywords

pedagogical stylistics
models of inversion
teaching grammar
literary texts
stylistic principles

How to Cite

Jaashan, H. M. (2020). The Impact of Incorporating Stylistic Models of Inversion in Teaching Grammar on Students’ Comprehension of Literary Text. Issues in Language Studies, 9(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.2447.2020

Abstract

Pedagogical stylistics increases EFL learners’ awareness about the way the language functions in different texts. It also enhances innovative learning and teaching. This study aims at knowing the impact of incorporating stylistic models of inversion in teaching grammar on students’ comprehension of literary texts. It also aims to explore the learners’ perceptions about incorporating them in grammar courses. The models were adopted by (Galperin, 1977). A total of 85 EFL learners at King Khalid University participated in this study; 41 are students of Grammar III and are divided into two groups (15, 26); 44 are students of Grammar IV and are divided into two groups (20, 24). The second phase of the research is a unified long text exam that contains stylistic models of inversion in literary texts and is given to all students. Generally, the post-test results show that the participants identify stylistic models of inversion that help them understand the meaning of texts. Moreover, the quantitative approach shows the learners' preference for incorporating models in grammar courses because they are important in comprehending literary texts. The study recommends considering stylistic implications in teaching grammar in general and stylistic models of inversion in particular.

https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.2447.2020

References

Anees, I. (2016). Sir Aloghah. Egypt: Egyptian Anglo library.

Bakhtin, M. M. (2004). Dialogic origin and dialogic pedagogy of grammar: Stylistics in teaching Russian language in secondary school. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(6), 12-49.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059233

Bailyn, J. F. (2004). Generalised inversion. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory, 22(1), 1-50.

https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005556.40898.a5

Baldick, C. (1996). The concise Oxford dictionary of literary terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borg, S., & Burns, A. (2008). Integrating grammar in adult TESOL classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 456-482.

https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn020

Burke, M., Csabi, S., Week, L., & Zerkowitz, J. (Eds.). (2012). Pedagogical stylistics: Current trends in language, literature and ELT. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Cancellaro, K. (2015). Investigating the gap between L2 grammar textbooks and authentic speech: Corpus-based comparisons of reported speech. Journal of Language and Education, 1(1), 6-11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2015-1-1-6-11

https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2015-1-1-6-11

Carter, R., & Nash, W. (1990). Seeing through language. Oxford: Blackwell.

Clark, U., & Zyngier, S. (2003). Towards a pedagogical stylistics. Language and Literature, 12(4), 339-351.

https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470030124003

Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2011). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Cushing, I. (2018). Stylistics goes to school. Language and Literature, 27(4), 271-285.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947018794093

Cushing, I. (2018). 'Suddenly, I am part of the poem': Texts as worlds, reader-response and grammar in teaching poetry. English in Education, 52(1), 7-19.

https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2018.1414398

Culicover, P. W., & Levine, R. D. (2001). A reconsideration of locative inversion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19, 283-310.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010646417840

Department for English. (2013). English literature GCSE subject content and assessment objectives. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/governemnt/upload/system/upload/attachement_data/file/254497/GCSE_English_language.pdf

Dryer, M. S. (2005). 81 Order of subject, object, and verb. In M. S. Dryer, & M. Haspelmath. (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online (pp. 330-333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fogal, G. G. (2015). Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign language and second language contexts: A synthesis of empirical research. Language and Literature, 24(1), 54-72.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014555450

Ghanizadeh, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2016). EFL teachers' teaching style, creativity, and burnout: A path analysis approach. Cogent Education, 3(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0021-8

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0021-8

Giovanelli, M., & Clayton, D. (Eds.). (2016). Knowing about language: Linguistics and the secondary English classroom. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719818

Giovanelli, M. (2010). Pedagogical stylistics: A text world theory approach to the teaching of poetry. English in Education, 44(3), 214-231.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2010.01074.x

Galperin, I. R. (1977). Stylistic.: Moscow: Higher School.

Hall, G. (2014). Pedagogical stylistics. In M. Burke. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 239-252). London: Routledge.

Huang, Y. (2019). The application of stylistic analysis in college English teaching. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2991/icem-18.2019.145

https://doi.org/10.2991/icem-18.2019.145

Jesperson, O. (1943). Essentials of English grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.

Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762949

Kang, C. (2018). Stylistics and the teaching of advanced English for senior English majors. Theory Practice in Language Studies, 8(10), 1346-1350.

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0810.13

Myhill, D. A., Jones, S. M., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2012). Re-thinking grammar: The impact of embedded grammar teaching on students' writing and students' metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education, 27(2), 139-166.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.637640

Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190403

Nørgaard, N., Montoro, R., & Busse, B. (2010). Key terms in stylistics. New York, NY: Continuum International Pub. Group.

Short, M. (1996). Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.

Short, M. H. (1984). Speech presentation, the novels and the press. In W. van Peer. (Ed.), The taming of the text (pp. 61-81). London: Routledge.

Simpson, P. (1999). Pedagogical stylistics and literary evaluation. Journal of Literary Studies, 15(34), 510-528.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02564719908530242

Simpson, P. (2014). Just what is narrative urgency? Language and Literature, 23(1), 3-22.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947013510650

Song, J. J. (2012). Word order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033930

Sotirova, V. (2016). Empirical stylistics as a learning and research tool in the study of narrative viewpoint. Scientific approaches to literature in learning environments, 227-252.

https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.24.12sot

Watson, A. (2015). The problem of grammar teaching: A case study of the relationship between a teacher's beliefs and pedagogical practice. Language and Education, 29(4), 332-346.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1016955

Whiteley, S., & Canning, P. (2017). Reader response research in stylistics. Language and Literature, 26(2), 71-87.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704724

Widdowson, H. G. (1975). Stylistics and the teaching of literature. London: Routledge.

Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal

1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.

2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.

3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.

4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.

5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.

6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.