Modeling Environmental Impact Factor of Harmful Chemical Compounds in Polluted Water Discharge in Offshore Installations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jaspe.9073.2025Keywords:
Fate, Environmental impact factor, Polluted water, Offshore installation, Marine environmentAbstract
The development of a novel model to study the fate and environmental impact factor (EIF) of harmful chemical compounds in polluted water discharges from an offshore installation in Nigeria's marine environment was carried out in this study. The developed numerical fate model incorporates the environmental impact factor, , derived stochastically on a specific fuzzy logic-based framework, and the boundary value problem of the resulting fate and EIF model was solved via finite element method in MATLAB environment and the Dose-related Risk and Effects Assessment Model (DREAM) software using prevailing field and meteorological conditions of the marine environment. The fate concentrations of oil dispersants, harmful heavy metals (such as copper and mercury), and aromatic compounds (such as naphthalene, benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene-xylene (BTEX)) simulated at polluted water discharge rates of 3,000, 5,000, 25,000 and 75,000 barrels/day (bpd)) and average temperature of 27oC were used to compute EIFs of harmful chemical compounds in the marine environment. The results showed the produced water (PW) discharged volume and the corresponding EIF. For produced water discharge rates of 3,000, 5,000, 25,000 and 75,000 bpd, the simulated EIFs are 0, 5.6135, 5.3072 and 3.7150respectively, which is indicative of environmental risk far greater than the commonly accepted 5% risk margin in the water column in the cases of 5,000, 25,000 and 75,000 bpd. Higher risk impact derived from higher discharge rates may be effectively handled by water dilution and transport.
References
Lee, K. & Neff, J. (2011). Produced water: Environmental risks and advances in mitigation technologies, Springer.
OSPAR (2012). Guidelines in support of recommendation 2012/5 for a risk-based approach to the management of produced water discharges from offshore installations, OSPAR Commission.
OSPAR (2014). Establishment of a list of predicted no effect concentrations (PNECs) for naturally occurring substances in produced water. In: Technical Report.
OSPAR (2019). Discharges, spills and emissions from offshore oil and gas installations in 2017. In: Technical Report.
Beyer, J., Goksøyr, A., Hjermann, D. Ø. & Klungsøyr, J. (2020). Environmental effects of offshore produced water discharges: a review focused on the Norwegian continental shelf. Marine Environmental Research, 162, 105155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105155
Nepstad, R., Hansen, B. H. & Skancke, J. (2021). North Sea produced water PAH exposure and uptake in early life stages of Atlantic cod. Marine Environmental Research, 163, 105203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105203
Nepstad, R., Kotzakoulakis, K., Hansen, B. H., Nordam, T. & Carroll, J. (2023). An impact-based environmental risk assessment model toolbox for offshore produced water discharges. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 191, 114979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114979
Rye, H., Reed, M. & Ekrol, N. (1998). Sensitivity analysis and simulation of dispersed oil concentrations in the North Sea with the provann model. Environmental Modeling Software, 13, 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00047-4
Smit, M. G. D., Frost, T. K. & Johnsen, S. (2011). Achievements of risk-based produced water management on the Norwegian continental shelf (2002–2008). Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management 7, 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.215
Ditlevsen, M.K. (2017). Eif beregninger for produsert vann fra johan castberg 2016. In: Technical Report OC2017 F-047.
Johnsen, S., Frost, T., Hjelsvold, M. & Utvik, T. (2000). The Environmental impact factor - a proposed tool for produced water impact reduction, management and regulation. In: SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production.
Vora, M., Njau, J. G., Sanni, S. & Flage, R. (2022). Environmental risk assessment of inter-well partitioning tracer compounds shortlisted for the offshore oil and gas industry. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 40(6), 1743–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987221097999
McFarlane, J., Bostick, D. T. & Luo, H. (2002). Characterization and Modeling of Polluted water. Presented at the 2002 Ground Water Protection Council Polluted Water Conference, Colorado Springs, Co, October 16–17.
Neff, J. M. (2002). Bioaccumulation in marine organisms: Effect of contaminants from oil well produced water. Amsterdam (NL): Elsevier.
Nepstad, R., Nordam, T., Ellingsen, I. H., Eisenhauer, L., Litzler, E. & Kotzakoulakis, K. (2022). Impact of flow field resolution on produced water transport in Lagrangian and Eulerian models. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 182, 113928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113928
Pham, H.H.T., Lohne, H.P., Arild, Ø., Schlenk, D. & Pampanin, D.M. (2020). Modeling of Environmental Fate and Effects of Oil Leakages from Abandoned Subsea Wells Using an Environmental Impact Factor Tool. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 17(3), 626–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4392
Ray, J.P. & Engelhardt, F.R. (1992). Polluted Water Technological/Environmental Issues and Solutions, Plenum Press, NY.
Reed, M. & Hetland, B. (2002). DREAM: a dose-related exposure assessment model technical description of physical-chemical fates components. In: Proceedings of SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Akar, P.J. & Jirka, G. H. (1994). Buoyant spreading processes in pollutant transport and mixing, Part 1: lateral spreading in strong ambient current. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 32, 815–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689409498692
Akar, P.J. & Jirka, G.H. (1995). Buoyant spreading processes in pollutant transport and mixing, Part 2: upstream spreading in weak ambient current advection. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 33, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689409498692
Doneker, R.L. & Jirka, G.H. (1990). Expert systems for hydrodynamic mixing zone analysis of conventional and toxic single port discharges (CORMIX1). Technical Report EPA/600/3-90/012, U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA.
Doneker, R.L. & Jirka, G.H. (1991). Expert systems for design and mixing zone analysis of aqueous pollutant discharges. J of Water Resources Planning and Management ASCE, 117(6), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1991)117:6(679)
Doneker, R.L. & Jirka, G.H. (1997). D-CORMIX continuous dredge disposal mixing zone water quality model laboratory and field validation study, OGI Technical Report.
Doneker, R.L. & Jirka, G.H. (2000). The CORMIX-GI system for mixing zone prediction, regulatory analysis, and outfall design. Marine Waste Water Disposal 2000 Conference, Genova Italy, Nov/Dec.
Doneker, R.L. & Jirka, G.H. (2001). CORMIX-GI rule-based systems for mixing zone analysis in virtual reality. 3rd International Symposium on Environmental Hydraulics, Tempe, AZ.
Doneker, R.L. & Jirka, G.H. (2001). CORMIX-GI systems for mixing zone analysis of brine wastewater disposal. Desalination, 139(1–3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00318-6
Doneker, R.L. & Jirka, G.H. (2007). CORMIX user manual: A hydrodynamic mixing zone model and decision support system for pollutant discharges into surface waters, EPA-823-K-07-001.
Jackson, L. & Myers, J. (2002). Alternative use of polluted water in aquaculture and hydroponic systems at naval petroleum reserve No. 3. Presented at the 2002 Ground Water Protection Council Polluted water Conference, Colorado Springs, CO, Oct. 16-17.
Jirka, G.H., Doneker, R. L. & Barnwell, T. O. (1991). CORMIX: A comprehensive expert system for mixing zone analysis of aqueous pollutant discharges. Water Science Technology, 24(6), 267–274.
Reed, R. & Johnsen, S. (1996). Polluted water Environment Issues and Mitigation technologies, Plenum Press, New York, NY.
Durell, G., Utvik, T. R., Johnsen, S., Frost, T. & Neff, J. (2006). Oil well produced water discharges to the North Sea. Part I: comparison of deployed mussels (Mytilus edulis), semi-permeable membrane devices, and the dream model predictions to estimate the dispersion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Marine Environmental Research, 62(3), 194–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.03.013
Neff, J.M., Johnson, S., Frost, T.K., Utvik, T.I.R. & Durell, G.S. (2006). Oil well polluted water discharges to the North Sea. Part II: Comparison of deployed mussels (Mytilus edulis) and the DREAM Model to predict ecological risk. Marine Environmental Research, 62, 224-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.03.012
Nepstad, R., Skancke, J. & Hansen, B.H. (2022). DREAM produced water plume and uptake simulations - predictions and comparisons with data from the 2021 water column monitoring at Ekofisk: plume trajectory and PAH uptake in mussels and copepods. In: Technical Report 2022:01303 A. SINTEF Ocean.
Niu, H., Lee, K., Robinson, B., Cobanli, S. & Li, P. (2016). Monitoring and modeling the dispersion of produced water on the Scotian shelf. Environmental Systems Research, 5, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-016-0070-5
Reed, M. & Rye, H. (2011). The DREAM model and the environmental impact factor: decision support for environmental risk management. In: Produced Water. Springer, 189–203.
Georgie, W.J., Sell, D. & Baker, M.J. (2001). Establishing best practicable environmental option practice for polluted water management in the gas and oil production facilities. SPE 66545, Presented at the SPE/EPA/DOE Exploration and Environmental Conference, San Antonio.
Gillibrand, P.A., Stagg, R., Turrell, W.R. & Furnes, G. (1995). Observations and modeling of the results of low-level hydrocarbons discharges in the North Sea. ICES CM/c, 11, 421–429.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
To download Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal, click here
