Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is crucial for speaking tests as it provides a standardised framework to assess and gauge language proficiency accurately and consistently. This research evaluates ESL students’ awareness and perceived usefulness of the CEFR in group discussions. Data were obtained from 105 diploma students from UiTM Sarawak and UiTM Alor Gajah using an online questionnaire. The results indicate a moderate level of CEFR awareness, although opinions on its impact and role in language assessment and goal setting were varied. Respondents generally view CEFR-aligned speaking tests positively, showing a favourable perception of its usefulness. However, some have expressed concerns that these tests could be potential obstacles in their efforts to improve their language skills. The study highlighted the need for further education and training on CEFR-aligned assessments to enhance students’ comprehension and confidence in language proficiency development. It also emphasises the importance of designing assessments that help learners overcome potential barriers to improving language proficiency.
References
Alderson, J. C. (2007). The CEFR and the need for more research. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 659-663.
Asdar, A. (2017, June). Students’ self-assessment on their spoken interaction using CEFR. In Proceedings Education and Language International Conference (Vol. 1, No. 1). Center for International Language Development of Unissula.
Awang, Z., & Kasuma, S. A. A. (2008, October). A study on secondary students’ perceptions of their motivation and attitude towards learning the English literature components. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11786079.pdf.
Baharum, N. N., Ismail, L., Nordin, N., & Razali, A. B. (2021). Aligning a university English language proficiency measurement tool with the CEFR: A case in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(S3), 157-178.
Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement and statistics. Sage.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2020). International language proficiency standards in the local context: Interpreting the CEFR in standard setting for exam reform in Luxembourg. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(2), 215-231.
Bueno, A., Madrid, D., & McLaren, N. (2006). TEFL in secondary education. Editorial Universidad de Granada.
Cinganotto, L. (2019). Online interaction in teaching and learning a foreign language: An Italian pilot project on the companion volume to the CEFR. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(1), 135-151.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Darancik, Y. (2018). Students’ views on language skills in foreign language teaching. International Education Studies, 11(7), 166-178.
Darmi, R., Saad, N. S. M., Abdullah, N., Puteh-Behak, F., Zakaria, A. Z., & Adnan, J. N. I. (2017). Teacher’s views on students’ performance in English language proficiency courses via CEFR descriptors. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(8), 363-370. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.336688
Faez, F., Majhanovich, S., Taylor, S. K., Smith, M., & Crowley, K. (2011). The power of “Can Do” statements: Teachers’ perceptions of CEFR-informed instruction in French as a second language classrooms in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 1-19.
Glover, P. (2011). Using CEFR level descriptors to raise university students’ awareness of their speaking skills. Language Awareness, 20(2), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.555556
Göksu, A. (2015). European language portfolio in Turkish high schools: Attitudes of EFL students. Reading Matrix Journal, 15(1), 121-132.
Hjetland, H. N., Brinchmann, E. I., Scherer, R., & Melby‐Lervåg, M. (2017). Preschool predictors of later reading comprehension ability: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1-155.
Idris, M., & Raof, A. H. A. (2017). The CEFR rating scale functioning: An empirical study on self-and peer assessments. Sains Humanika, 9(4), 11-17.
Jones, N., Saville, N., & Salamoura, A. (2016). Learning oriented assessment (Vol. 45). Cambridge University Press.
McNaughton, D. (2020). Utilizing multicultural literature to foster critical literacy in a secondary English classroom (Publication No. Order No. 27832554). [Doctoral dissertation, Rowan University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/utilizing-multicultural-literature-foster/docview/2395266763/se-2
McNaughton, S. & Lai, M. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of an intervention model based on data use: A replication series across clusters of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 203-228.
Razali, N. H., & Latif, L. A. (2019). CEFR-based English speaking skill self-assessments by Malaysian graduating non-native English-speaking students. Malaysian International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 2, 82-93.
Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge.
Nawai, R., & Said, N. E. M. (2020). Implementation challenges of Common European Framework Reference (CEFR) in a Malaysian setting: Insights on English teachers’ attitude. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(7), 28-41.
Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., & Lee, J. C. (2018). CEFR-aligned school-based assessment in the Malaysian primary ESL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 452-463. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13311
Sugg, R. (2019). CEFR-based rubrics and feedback: What you can do! Bulletin of Hiroshima Bunkyo University, 54, 35-50.
Uri, N. F. M., & Abd Aziz, M. S. (2020). The appropriacy and applicability of English assessment against CEFR global scale: Teachers’ judgment. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 26(3), 53-66.
Uri, N. F. M., & Abd Aziz, M. S. (2018). Implementation of CEFR in Malaysia: Teachers’ awareness and the challenges. 3L: Language, Linguistic, Literature, 24(3) 168-183. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-13
Uri, N. F. M. (2023). Challenges in CEFR adoption: Teachers’ understanding and classroom practice. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijmal.v7i1.21568
Zaki, A. W., & Darmi, R. (2021). CEFR: Education towards 21st Century of Learning. Why Matters?. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 4(2), 14-20.
Zheng, Y., Zhang, Y., & Yan, Y. (2016). Investigating the practice of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) outside Europe: A case study on the assessment of writing in English in China. British Council.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 UNIMAS Publisher